The internal inconsistency of the system by which we vote partly for our local candidate and partly for the Party they represent is most striking in the Whip system.
The job of a Whip is to ensure that the party's MPs vote according to the Party line on a specific issue. But why the need for them? Having elected an MP to a constituency, should that MP not then serve the constituency first and their Party second?
I propose an abolition of the Whip system as a first step to ensuring that we the people are properly represented by those we elect.
Dynamic Democracy is now closed, and will no longer be maintained.
Please see this explanation.
What should your government be talking about? Tell the world!
Dynamic Democracy is an experiment in Open Governance that lets you, the user, suggest and vote for bills that you wish the government was considering. Learn more »
